Corneal endothelial validation in the eye bank: differences in automated methods and repeatability.

PURPOSE: To evaluate reproducibility of endothelial cell density (ECD) measurements using the Konan Cell Check D in donor corneas by two different ophthalmologists and to compare the two automated cell count methods (center and flex-center) available in the software of this specular microscope. METHODS: ECD values were quantified in 54 donor corneas by two independent investigators using the Cell Check D (Konan Medical USA Inc) with both automated cell count methods. In the center method, at least 30 contiguous cells are marked. For the flex-center method, an area is delineated and only the cells within the designated area are counted. RESULTS: The mean ECD was 2473.81±378.22 cells/mm2. Good ECD intergrader reproducibility for the center (ICC=0.821) and the flex-center method (ICC=0.784) were noted. Poor reliability was observed for coefficient of variation and hexagonality (ICC≤0.265). When both methods for ECD analysis were compared, a moderate correlation for the two independent graders using the two manual (center and flex-center) methods was detected (correlation coefficient of 0.678 and 0.745 for each of the investigators). Comparison between methods yielded significantly higher ECD with the flex-center method (P=0.013). When corneas were divided by ECD, those under 2200 cells/mm2 and those between 2200 and 2700 cells/mm2 also had significantly higher ECD with the flex-center method (P<0.022). CONCLUSIONS: ECD values are reproducible with both methods, although the flex-center method ECDs tend to be higher, particularly in cases of low ECD. Eye banks and surgeons should exercise caution in making decisions based only on small differences in ECD.

Convergence insufficiencyCentral mini-plication of medial rectusDiplopiaConsecutive esotropiaSurgical overcorrection / Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in tears: Ocular surface immunity to COVID-19

Objetivos Evaluar la presencia de anticuerpos IgA e IgG específicos del SARS-CoV-2 en lágrima de sujetos no vacunados y vacunados contra la COVID-19 con antecedentes de infección SARS-CoV-2. Correlacionar los resultados en lágrima con los de saliva y sangre, datos clínicos y regímenes de vacunación. Métodos Estudio transversal que incluyó a sujetos con antecedentes de infección SARS-CoV-2, tanto no vacunados como vacunados contra la COVID-19. Se recogieron 3muestras: lágrima, saliva y sangre. Se analizaron IgA e IgG frente a S-1 SARS-CoV-2 con ELISA semicuantitativo. Resultados Treinta sujetos, con una edad media 36,4±10, varones 13/30 (43,3%) con historia de infección SARS-CoV-2 leve; 13/30 (43,3%) habían recibido un régimen de 2 dosis y 13/30 (43,3%) un régimen de 3 dosis de vacunación anti-COVID-19, 4/30 (13,3%) no estaban vacunados. Todos los sujetos con vacunación completa presentaron IgA detectable en los 3biofluidos. Entre los no vacunados, se detectó IgA en 3/4 sujetos en lágrima y saliva, mientras que no se detectó IgG. No se observaron diferencias entre la pauta de vacunación de 2 y 3 dosis según los títulos IgA-IgG. Conclusiones Anticuerpos IgA e IgG del SARS-CoV-2 están presentes en lágrimas de pacientes con antecedentes de COVID-19 leve, lo que destaca el papel de la superficie ocular como primera línea de defensa frente a la infección. La mayoría de los sujetos no vacunados presentaron IgA a largo plazo en lágrima y saliva. La inmunización híbrida (infección natural más vacunación) parece potenciar las respuestas IgG mucosas y sistémicas. No se observaron diferencias entre la pauta de 2 y 3 dosis (AU)

Purpose To evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA and IgG antibodies in tears of unvaccinated and anti-COVID-19 vaccinated subjects with previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To compare results in tears with those in saliva and serum and correlate with clinical data and vaccination regimens. Methods Cross-sectional study including subjects with a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, both unvaccinated and vaccinated against COVID-19. Three samples were collected: tears, saliva and serum. IgA and IgG antibodies against S-1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed with a semi-quantitative ELISA. Results Thirty subjects, mean age 36.4±10, males 13/30 (43.3%) with history of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. 13/30 (43.3%) subjects had received a 2-dose regimen and 13/30 (43.3%) a 3-dose regimen of anti-COVID-19 vaccine, 4/30 (13.3%) subjects were unvaccinated. All the participants with full anti-COVID-19 vaccination (2-or 3-doses) presented detectable anti-S1 specific IgA in all 3biofluids, tears, saliva and serum. Among unvaccinated subjects, specific IgA was detected in 3/4 subjects in tears and saliva, whereas IgG was not detected. Considering IgA and IgG antibodies titers, no differences were observed between the 2- and 3-dose vaccination regimen. Conclusions SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA and IgG antibodies were detected in tears after mild COVID-19, highlighting the role of the ocular surface as a first line of defense against infection. Most naturally infected unvaccinated individuals exhibit long-term specific IgA in tears and saliva. Hybrid immunization (natural infection plus vaccination) appears to enhance mucosal and systemic IgG responses. However, no differences were observed between the 2- and 3-dose vaccination schedule (AU)

[Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in tears: Ocular surface immunity to COVID-19]. / Detección de anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2 en lágrimas: inmunidad de la superficie ocular frente a COVID-19.

Purpose: To evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA and IgG antibodies in tears of unvaccinated and anti-COVID-19 vaccinated subjects with previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To compare results in tears with those in saliva and serum and correlate with clinical data and vaccination regimens. Methods: Cross-sectional study including subjects with a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, both unvaccinated and vaccinated against COVID-19. Three samples were collected: tears, saliva and serum. IgA and IgG antibodies against S-1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed with a semi-quantitative ELISA. Results: Thirty subjects, mean age 36.4 ± 10, males 13/30 (43.3%) with history of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. 13/30 (43.3%) subjects had received a 2-dose regimen and 13/30 (43.3%) a 3-dose regimen of anti-COVID-19 vaccine, 4/30 (13.3%) subjects were unvaccinated. All the participants with full anti-COVID-19 vaccination (2-or 3-doses) presented detectable anti-S1 specific IgA in all 3 biofluids, tears, saliva and serum. Among unvaccinated subjects, specific IgA was detected in 3/4 subjects in tears and saliva, whereas IgG was not detected. Considering IgA and IgG antibodies titers, no differences were observed between the 2- and 3-dose vaccination regimen. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA and IgG antibodies were detected in tears after mild COVID-19, highlighting the role of the ocular surface as a first line of defense against infection. Most naturally infected unvaccinated individuals exhibit long-term specific IgA in tears and saliva. Hybrid immunization (natural infection plus vaccination) appears to enhance mucosal and systemic IgG responses. However, no differences were observed between the 2- and 3-dose vaccination schedule.

Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in tears: Ocular surface immunity to COVID-19.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the presence of SARS-COV-2 specific IgA and IgG antibodies in tears of unvaccinated and anti-COVID-19 vaccinated subjects with previous history of SARS-COV-2 infection. To compare results in tears with those in saliva and serum and correlate with clinical data and vaccination regimens. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including subjects with a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, both unvaccinated and vaccinated against COVID-19. Three samples were collected: tears, saliva and serum. IgA and IgG antibodies against S-1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed with a semi-quantitative ELISA. RESULTS: 30 subjects, mean age 36.4 ±â€¯10, males 13/30 (43.3%) with history of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. 13/30 (43.3%) subjects had received a 2-dose regimen and 13/30 (43.3%) a 3-dose regimen of anti-COVID-19 vaccine, 4/30 (13.3%) subjects were unvaccinated. All the participants with full anti-COVID-19 vaccination (2-or 3-doses) presented detectable anti-S1 specific IgA in all three biofluids, tears, saliva and serum. Among unvaccinated subjects, specific IgA was detected in 3/4 subjects in tears and saliva, whereas IgG was not detected. Considering IgA and IgG antibodies titers, no differences were observed between the 2- and 3-dose vaccination regimen. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA and IgG antibodies were detected in tears after mild COVID-19, highlighting the role of the ocular surface as a first line of defense against infection. Most naturally infected unvaccinated individuals exhibit long-term specific IgA in tears and saliva. Hybrid immunization (natural infection plus vaccination) appears to enhance mucosal and systemic IgG responses. However, no differences were observed between the 2- and 3-dose vaccination schedule.

Congenital retinal macrovessels: Case presentation.

We present an uncommon case of a unilateral congenital retinal macrovessel documented with retinography, perimetry, fluorescein angiography and macular optical coherence tomography. In the case presented the macrovessel crossed the horizontal meridian, between macula and optic disk. A literature review has been performed on congenital retinal macrovessels, possible structural and visual alterations they may cause and their association with other pathologies.

Macrovasos congénitos retinianos: presentación de un caso / Congenital retinal macrovessels: Case presentation

Presentamos un caso de macrovaso congénito retiniano estudiado mediante retinografía, campo visual, angiografía fluoresceínica y tomografía óptica de coherencia macular. El macrovaso atravesaba el meridiano horizontal, nasalmente entre papila y mácula. Además, se realiza una revisión de los macrovasos congénitos retinianos, las alteraciones visuales y estructurales que causan su asociación con otras enfermedades y su diagnóstico diferencial (AU)

We present an uncommon case of a unilateral congenital retinal macrovessel documented with retinography, perimetry, fluorescein angiography and macular optical coherence tomography. In the case presented the macrovessel crossed the horizontal meridian, between macula and optic disk. A literature review has been performed on congenital retinal macrovessels, possible structural and visual alterations they may cause and their association with other pathologies (AU)

Photosensitive ganglion cells: A diminutive, yet essential population.

Our visual system has evolved to provide us with an image of the scene that surrounds us, informing us of its texture, colour, movement, and depth with an enormous spatial and temporal resolution, and for this purpose, the image formation (IF) dedicates the vast majority of our retinal ganglion cell (RGC) population and much of our cerebral cortex. On the other hand, a minuscule proportion of RGCs, in addition to receiving information from classic cone and rod photoreceptors, express melanopsin and are intrinsically photosensitive (ipRGC). These ipRGC are dedicated to non-image-forming (NIF) visual functions, of which we are unaware, but which are essential for aspects related to our daily physiology, such as the timing of our circadian rhythms and our pupillary light reflex, among many others. Before the discovery of ipRGCs, it was thought that the IF and NIF functions were distinct compartments regulated by different RGCs, but this concept has evolved in recent years with the discovery of new types of ipRGCs that innervate subcortical IF regions, and therefore have IF visual functions. Six different types of ipRGCs are currently known. These are termed M1-M6, and differ in their morphological, functional, molecular properties, central projections, and visual behaviour responsibilities. A review is presented on the melanopsin visual system, the most active field of research in vision, for which knowledge has grown exponentially during the last two decades, when RGCs giving rise to this pathway were first discovered.

Células ganglionares fotosensibles: una población diminuta pero esencial / Photosensitive ganglion cells: A diminutive, yet essential population

Nuestro sistema visual ha evolucionado para proveernos una imagen de la escena que nos rodea informándonos de su textura, color, movimiento y profundidad con una enorme capacidad de resolución tanto espacial como temporal, y a esta finalidad la formación de imágenes (FI) dedica la inmensa mayoría de nuestras células ganglionares de la retina (CGR) y gran parte de nuestra corteza cerebral. Por otra parte, una proporción minúscula de las CGR, además de recibir información de fotorreceptores clásicos conos y bastones, expresan melanopsina y son intrínsecamente fotosensibles (CGRif). Estas CGRif se dedican a funciones visuales no formadoras de imágenes (NFI), de las que somos inconscientes, pero que resultan imprescindibles para aspectos relacionados con nuestra fisiología cotidiana como la puesta en hora de nuestros ritmos circadianos y nuestro reflejo fotomotor, entre otras muchas. Desde el descubrimiento de las CGRif se pensó que las funciones FI y NFI eran compartimentos distintos regulados por diferentes CGR, pero este concepto ha evolucionado en los últimos años con el descubrimiento de nuevos tipos de CGRif que inervan regiones subcorticales FI y, por tanto, presentan funciones FI. Hoy se conocen 6 tipos diferentes de CGRif que se denominan M1-M6 y difieren en sus propiedades morfológicas, funcionales, moleculares, proyecciones centrales y responsabilidades en comportamientos visuales. En este trabajo revisamos el sistema visual melanopsínico, el campo de investigación más activo en visión y cuyo conocimiento ha crecido exponencialmente durante las últimas 2décadas, desde que se descubrieron por primera vez las CGR que dan origen a esta vía (AU)

Our visual system has evolved to provide us with an image of the scene that surrounds us, informing us of its texture, colour, movement, and depth with an enormous spatial and temporal resolution, and for this purpose, the image formation (IF) dedicates the vast majority of our retinal ganglion cell (RGC) population and much of our cerebral cortex. On the other hand, a minuscule proportion of RGCs, in addition to receiving information from classic cone and rod photoreceptors, express melanopsin and are intrinsically photosensitive (ipRGC). These ipRGC are dedicated to non-image-forming (NIF) visual functions, of which we are unaware, but which are essential for aspects related to our daily physiology, such as the timing of our circadian rhythms and our pupillary light reflex, among many others. Before the discovery of ipRGCs, it was thought that the IF and NIF functions were distinct compartments regulated by different RGCs, but this concept has evolved in recent years with the discovery of new types of ipRGCs that innervate subcortical IF regions, and therefore have IF visual functions. Six different types of ipRGCs are currently known. These are termed M1-M6, and differ in their morphological, functional, molecular properties, central projections, and visual behaviour responsibilities. A review is presented on the melanopsin visual system, the most active field of research in vision, for which knowledge has grown exponentially during the last 2decades, when RGCs giving rise to this pathway were first discovered (AU)